Showing posts with label Spotify. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spotify. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 December 2011

My 2011 Spotify list: the year of the gals

End of the year = LISTS!!

Here is my 2011 music list. You can listen to it on Spotify: Lista 2011 Stefvanef

The first 5 tracks of the list are from my favourite 2011 albums. The others are songs I played and played and played.



Music in 2011 was pretty good. Not as surprising as in 2010, when I discovered so much new music and when I went from surprise to surprise. 2011 was more about known artist doing a good job.

It must be said it was also a pretty good year for the female artists: Joan, Tune-Yeards, Polly-Jean, Laura, EMA, Feist, and so much more: great work, keep it up. I've listened a lot to you this year.

Spotify, a returning theme in this blog, also limited drastically it's free service. When that happened a lot of my friends looked for other free options. I started to pay. A funny consequence was that I stopped wondering about Spotify's future: I became a paying user, the monthly invoice became normal and I stopped worrying about what would happen or how the business-model would work out. It just does, it became part of daily routine and it stopped being a concern. Case closed.
Also true: Oh Land, The Black Keys and Tom Waits would have probably be in this list if they had been in Spotify: sure you don't want the royalties for letting me play your songs in Spotify?

Let's bring on more music in 2012!

Thursday, 11 February 2010

The end of Spotify?

Only a few weeks ago I wrote in this blog that Spotify was one of my internet highlights of 2009. Today Warner Music announces that it's retreating from free music streaming services and this might just mean the end of Spotify.

When I first heard the news that Warner will no longer license their music to streaming sites, my first reaction was to have a look at what we will miss if Warner takes off its songs of Spotify. I looked up 'Label:Warner' to see which artist are on Warner's label and can be listened to on Spotify. The first 15 results included Paris Hilton and Van Halen, so I thought: no real harm done – we can do without Warner on free music streaming.
But of course my reasoning is beside the point: The greatness of Spotify is that it has everything and for the service it doesn't make any difference what artists you like. Of course, when I investigated a bit more, I learned that some of my favourite artists are with Warner, and I'm sure R.E.M, Madonna and Prince will be badly missed on streaming sites by a lot of people.

So what does this mean for Spotify? In my opinion - and this is of course very preliminary – I think Spotify is virtually dead. Not that the news of Warner will take of Spotify from the internet as per tomorrow, but I've got a feeling that Spotify will easily slip into yet another forgotten web based music service just like Deezer or MySpace. They had their time and we were big fans of them. We thought they were what the future would look like. And they did give us a good idea of what the future for music in internet would look like and they helped shaping that same future. But now that we're here, they're not around any more. OK, they are still on-line, but when was the last time you discovered a new band on MySpace and how many of your friends still listen to Deezer? The piracy P2P sites have been changing constantly over the years – moving from Napster to Kazaa and on to eMule and BitTorrent. It looks like legal platforms share the same faith.

First the reasons not to panic: Warner did not (yet) say it's going to take off its tracks of Spotify. So there is still a possibility that Warner will keep his music on existing sites, but maybe they will not upload new material, or they can stop working with new platforms.
The thing is: when they do decide to take off their music, it will be a hell of a blow for streaming services. Once you can't find the music you want to hear, you'll start looking for other ways of listening to the music. And most likely people will choose illegal P2P sites to download their music again.
Even if only Warner drops out, it's still one of the 4 majors, so you can roughly estimate that you won't have access to 25% of your favourite tracks.

In their statement, Warner told that free streaming service is 'clearly not positive for the industry'. Said in another way: we don't get enough money out of our catalogue from free streaming.
Free streaming services are funded by advertising: you hear ads in between the music you hear. The business model sounds good, but advertising revenue doesn't add up to a profitable model for the labels. They just receive the royalties for their tracks, and there doesn't seem to be big money in that.
From a business point of view, the free streaming model with advertising is equal to listening to a radio station. The only issue is that when everybody was still listening to the radio, the labels were selling lots of CDs with big profit margins. So in that time, radio was supposed to help them sell records and didn't need to produce a direct profit for the labels. Now that the industry is heavily damaged, the streaming services aren't perceived as help for their sales. The industry sees it as a threat.

I guess Warner will stay on paying streaming services. Spotify and other services offer a premium subscription, in which you pay a monthly fee to have access to the music without the advertising. If the labels get their share of these subscriptions, they'll get a share of a hugely profitable market.
So here's the big question: since I love Spotify so much: would I pay a monthly fee for it to keep it service? I am inclined to say that I wouldn't.
My service would cost me 120€ per year. This is not much compared to the price I used to pay for a CD: I can buy 8 CDs of 15€ with that amount, and this includes the services for one year. Considering this, Spotify Premium is pretty cheap.
But moving from a free service to a paid one is kind of hard after one year free streaming and some more years free and illegal downloading. Ans moving to a paying service should give you a better product. Though in this case, the only change would be not to hear the ads, which is not a big improvement.
It looks like we're used to the fact that we will find our music somewhere for free: we find the video on YouTube, we have P2P downloading. When Spotify arrived, we swapped the lousy interface of P2P for free streaming and the price we paid was listening to advertising. That was acceptable. But now, is the interface worth its money? You also have to consider that the 120€ is streaming only, so you can't put the music on your iPod to listen to it on the metro. The only option is installing it on you mobile, which is still a pretty expensive way to use internet services.

I think it will be the same story like the ones we had before: first a couple of songs are taken off Spotify, then some more, and then a big artist's whole catalogue. We'll get Facebook groups named 'I bet I can find 1.000.000 people who want Madonna in Spotify'. Then you drop out once, because your favourite artist has a new album, and you can't find it streamed. And bit by bit, we'll turn again to P2P, I suppose. I will, if I'm not offered some (free) alternative. And within a year or so, somebody will mention Spotify, and I'll remember I used to like that service but I'll find that I'm not using it any more.


Sunday, 10 January 2010

My Internet 2009 Top 5: Spotify

If you live in a country where you don't have Spotify, then I feel sorry for you. Of course it's not your fault, but it's a real drag. Spotify has really been the new launch of 2009, a web-application that I can say changed my daily life.
For those who don't know it: spotify is a web-based application which you
download on your computer. The application gives you access to a huge amount of music. It works with streaming, so you can only listen to the songs, you don't actually 'have' the music at any stage. So you can't upload it onto your mp4.

The good things about spotify are:

There is a massive amount of music to listen to. It's not all there, but you can find as good as anything.

You can listen to exactly those songs you want to hear. So it's not like LastFM where the app is only recommending music to you all the time.

It's free. Spotify gets funded by advertising which is heard while you put on your songs. You hear about 1 spot every 20'. There is also display advertising on the application.

It's legal. Spotify has made deals with the 4 majors and some other labels to get the rights for the music. It looks like Spotify is paying the labels for each subscriber or for the streaming of the catalogue.

You have the possibility to make your lists with favourite songs. These lists are linked to your account, so if you log-on to another computer with your account, the lists will be uploaded there as well. You can share these lists with friends. You can even make collaborative lists, in which you can make lists together with your friends.

The user interface is really nice. And the streaming of the songs is flawless. So it's not like watching YouTube videos where the streaming is still pretty lousy.

Spotify has been launched at the end of 2008 and therefore it's still very young. But it did manage to get 1 million of subscribers in 1 year in Spain. That is in a country where internet penetration hasn't exceeded 60% yet. The rise and the value proposition of Spotify has been so important that the BBC included it in his list of the cultural elements which defined the passed decade.
In a more broad sense, spotify is just a part of a long story about how the internet changed the music industry. And it's an important story and one which hasn't finished yet. It's a story about social networks like MySpace, piracy, P2P file-sharing sites like E-mule and Napster and about new opportunities for music fan, artists and business, like the live streaming of a U2 concert on YouTube.

Since I'm on spotify, I have bought just 1 CD. That was a birthday present. So spotify actually stopped me buying music, which could be seen as something bad for the music industry. But at the same time I have to admit that I haven't downloaded one song from illegal sites this year. So that's a good sign for the music industry too. During the same year I have spent quite some euros on concert tickets. Since the prices for these concerts have all gone up, I'm still spending my fare share on music. And since we all have expensive iPods, we can't say that we're not paying anymore to listen to music. We've just made a shift from paying a lot for software (music albums) to paying a lot more for hardware (mp4 players).

Another good thing for spotify, is that I have discovered a lot of new music. Some people argued that Spotify didn't have the recommendation algorithm like LastFM. First of all this isn't true: Spotify has a very decent player, in which you can build your own radio, depending on type of music and the decades of music you want to hear. Second of all: I must say I haven't discovered so much new music for a very long time, and this even since I don't use the player of Spotify. The good thing is that you have a whole catalogue of songs and artist at your disposal and you can find almost any song in no time. You read an article or blogpost mentioning a song, and within seconds you can listen to see if you like the song. You also find a lot of music because of the nice search function within the catalogue. So, if you want to know who has a version of 'Thunder Road', the search function will give you the whole list of every artist in spotify who sings this Springsteen classic.

Last but not least: spotify works as a very good social media platform. It combines genuinely on- and off-line interaction with your friends. This looks like the real power of social media, and spotify gives a good value from this point of view. Spotify is enabled with direct share-functions so you can publish songs in facebook of twitter. But is has also the collaborative list in which you can build a list with your friends. For my birthday party this year, we had such a list and the invitees could upload the songs they wanted to hear on that list. When the party kicked in good, we put on the list and people could dance to the songs of their choice.

So where will it take spotify from here on? Since spotify has been on-line they are continually adding songs and artist to their catalogue. This is of course a good thing, and is quite the opposite of what happened to deezer.com, where since the launch they were continuously taking of songs. Various artist have also been presenting their new albums on spotify. Alicia Keys had her latest CD a week before the official release date on spotify. She's not my favourite artist, but I listened to it, even if I wouldn't care for it otherwise. But having it exclusively on spotify had me to give it a try.

More recent developments have been centred around their advertising. They've created new and innovative formats for display ads. It's understandable that they focus on this area, since they have to focus on creating revenue for this start-up.
But I would be more happy if spotify centered more around their innovative aspect. Like I said: they have a very good and powerful social media tool. So why don't they try to develop this more? Youtube shows that people like to add comments to their favourite songs, and that a reliable count of how much I listen to this or that song, gives an extra dimension to the platform. So if my favourite brand makes a list together with it's customers, it would be nice to see how many times this list has been played.
This year U2 broadcasted a concert on YouTube, which had an enormous impact on thousands of fans and had a lot of press in social media. If I were spotify, I would think on this example. Artists look ready to innovate, and being spotify you have the audience and the platform to start building something really powerful.

Here's maybe my favourite list on spotify: Songs for a roadtrip through Arizon from the Coca and Lola Blog.

PS - If you you live in a country where you can have spotify and you need an invitation: pop me an e-mail, and I'll see if I can help you out.


Tuesday, 29 December 2009

My internet 2009 Top 5 List

I'm a huge fan of lists. That's why I love so much 'High Fidelity', Nick Hornby's novel on list-making music fans. It's also why I like Tyler Brûlé's column in the Financial Times weekend edition: he's such a great and genuine list maker. He doesn't always make lists. But only from looking at the lay-out of his column, I can tell if it's a good one or a great one: if I can see a list in the lay-out, I'm confident I'll love his column.

Since I like lists so much, I sometimes talk in lists. When I like a tune, I love to say: 'that's in my all-time top 10', instead of just saying 'I really like this song'. I remember also asking my friend @Michaelnotte last year to make a 'Web Analytics Top 5 for 2008' in his blog. I was thinking myself on making such a list, but hadn't started with my blog yet. So I asked him to talk in my list-making language and to sum up his favourite internet-moments of 2008.

Now we're at the end of 2009, and I want to share with you my Top 5 internet moments of this year.

Coco & Lola

I'd like to write a separate post on all 5 of them in the next couple of weeks.

3 things which just missed out on the Top 5:

Avinash launches his new book 2.0 – and he really launched it the way we all should market launches nowadays. He involves you in the developing and launching of the book, so you feel like you're a part of it. He uses time in a very clever way, so you feel the building up and it makes you long to see the result. And he's very clear in his communication, which gives him the credit to promote his book on his blog in a very direct way, without having to fear to launch empty marketing promises. He delivers on his marketing promise.
It's not on my top 5, basically because I haven't' read the book yet.

Music concerts on the web – 2009 was the first year without Fabchannel on-line, and I'm still sad I didn't enjoy Fabchannel as much as I could have while it was there. 'The Reasons why we stopped', a letter published when Fabchannel was taken of the internet, is still as relevant in the discussion about music in the on- and off-line world. Since then, initiatives from U2 on YouTube, and some concerts on the Belgian website DeStandaard.be give me the impression that the idea behind Fabchannel was the correct one, and that the only reason they're not there any more is because they were too far ahead of their time. My #4 of my Top 5 makes a good case of how sports coverage is embracing the internet and all things 2.0 for their own good and for the good of the audience, so sport is getting a win-win out of internet. Music needs to do this to. Spotify (my #2 from the Top 5) is just one great initiative who understands this. Hopefully we'll only get more of these.
And hopefully the film industry starts to move to. It's about time.

LinkedIn – I got my new job on LinkedIn, and that makes me proud. It's just another reason to hail LinkedIn as my favourite social networking site. It's been like that for a while now, and I hope that this year it will keep me surprising.

3 things that are not in my Top 5 are:

Twitter – I've been on Twitter since this year and it's OK, but I use it only exclusively to get referrals to interesting blog-spots. So it's actually good for the #1 of my top 5, but just to get me to read lots of stuff, but not much more. I think twitter is pretty lousy at connecting me with other people and I must say it bores me to twit about my own whereabouts.

Social media: So much talking about social media in 2009, it's been too much. Let's just start seeing social media as something normal. It's there, everybody's using it. Now let's move on. Let's start to focus on the messages we can deliver, the value we can add. Lets' focus on what we want to do, not so much on the fact that we want to be in Social Media. For this, see my # 5 of my Top 5: Coco & Lola.

My own blogging-experience: if you're reading this, you're one of the (hopefully) happy few, and you now I've been pretty crap on updating this blog.

You'll find posts on all of my Top 5 topics in the upcoming weeks!

Happy New year!

Related Posts: